Every single consultant selling leadership training events claims that leadership is the key core competency of 21st Century business leaders, since they are selling it, So does it make them an expert or does it make their self-serving claims about the benefits of leadership training false? Both? Or neither?
Leadership training definitely appears to be a key element for the legendary success of the mega firms where the leader is the person everybody is happy to follow into uncharted territory and stick with against all chances. That appears to be the company’s inevitable secret of success – their eagerness to take on the metaphorical San Juan Hill which has been shown to them by their leader.
Just as there are mythical success stories traced to the followers of influential leaders, there have also been some tragic disasters. Tragic to the staff who followed and to the shareholders who lost their investment.
When a few of these charming leaders have so publicly lead their supporters, including a gullible media, over a cliff like so many lemmings, maybe more should have been required than the facility to convince others that they had the prerogative to lead them and the direction they were going was the right one.
Possibly management leadership training courses would have helped these leaders take their supporters and their organizations in the direction it would've been more profit-making for them to go. But since it was actually the stockholders money and since the leader had the support of the media and in numerous cases the congressmen – their actual failure to lead is frequently swept under the rug.
By contrast the owners of family firms, the overwhelming majority of those corporations in existence today, spend, invest, and lose their own cash – not that of faceless investor. About ninety p.c of all corporations have less than 200 staff so everybody knows everybody and virtually everything that is going on. When these entrepreneurs say they are “betting the farm” or this or that strategy – they literally mean it.
Everyone knows the gigantic proportion of new companies fail, some earlier than others, but failure is about 90%. That suggests the surviving 10% must be considered successful. Sadly only 30% of those successful corporations survive to the new generation. There is likely a different reason given by each one of them. But those reasons may simply be excuses for not taking responsibility to integrate management leadership training into the step-by-step day to day succession building process.
The family owned firms who survive thru and beyond the founder’s generation need leaders who are managers more than the mega firms because the extraordinarily jobs, futures, and potential fortunes of everyone in the organisation and in a number of cases the community are dependent on them.
For these firms management leadership training mixes the how to do the job, something that is known at least historically as the organization is still in business – with why do it in the first place. Managers who are also leaders understand that doing a job right is important but perhaps not as critical as doing the right job.
Management leadership training, when learned well and executed excellently, insures that the right jobs are done right.
The Internet permits us to easily research the decisions we make when comparing management leadership training corporations in before contracting with one of them, or considering an in-house solution. Considering a wide selection of business management training options before we make a call about which one is best for us suggests that we are much more likely to make the right choice.